Implementing Express.Route for Office 3.The selection of meet- me locations, which are the physical location where your Express.Route circuit connects your network to the Microsoft network, is influenced by the locations where people will access Office 3. more. As a Saa. S offering, Office 3. Iaa. S or Paa. S regional model in the same way Azure does. Instead, Office 3. This means the most important consideration you need to make when selecting meet- me locations for Express. Route for Office 3. The general recommendation for optimal Office 3. Office 3. 65 services are handed off into the Microsoft network over the shortest network path, this is also often being referred to as ‘hot potato’ routing. For example, if most of the Office 3. If your company has large user populations in many different regions, you may want to consider having multiple Express. Route circuits and meet- me locations.
![]() For some of your user locations, the shortest/most optimal path into Microsoft network and Office 3. WAN and Express. Route meet- me points, but via the Internet. Often times, there are multiple meet- me locations that could be selected within a region with relative proximity to your users. Fill out the following table to guide your decisions. Planned Express. Route meet- me locations in California and New York. Location. Number of people. Expected latency to Microsoft network over Internet egress. Expected latency to Microsoft network over Express. Route. Los Angeles. Silicon Valley)Washington DC1. New York)Dallas. 5,0. New York)Once the global network architecture showing the Office 3. Express. Route network service provider meet- me locations, and the quantity of people by location has been developed, it can be used to identify if any optimizations can be made. It may also show global hairpin network connections where traffic routes to a distant location in order to get the meet- me location. ![]() If a hairpin on the global network is discovered it should be remediated before continuing. Either find another meet- me location, or use selective Internet breakout egress points to avoid the hairpin. The first diagram, shows an example of a customer with two physical locations in North America. Network Monitoring Platforms (NMPs) - Comparison of NMPs, ActionPacked! 3 LiveAction is a platform that combines detailed network topology, device, and flow. ![]() You can see the information about office locations, Office 3.Express. Route meet- me locations.In this example, the customer has selected the meet- me location based on two principles, in order: Closest proximity to the people in their organization.Closest in proximity to a Microsoft datacenter where Office 3. . Expanding this concept slightly further, the second diagram shows an example multi- national customer faced with similar information and decision making. This customer has a small office in Bangladesh with only a small team of ten people focused on growing their footprint in the region. There is a meet- me location in Chennai and a Microsoft datacenter with Office 3. Chennai so a meet- me location would make sense; however, for ten people, the expense of the additional circuit is burdensome. As you look at your network, you’ll need to determine if the latency involved in sending your network traffic across your network is more effective than spending the capital to acquire another Express. Route circuit. Alternatively, the ten people in Bangladesh may experience better performance with their network traffic sent over the internet to the Microsoft network than they would routing on their internal network as we showed in the introductory diagrams and reproduced below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |